Comparison of MLA-C01 and MLA-C02
Side-by-side comparison
The following table shows the domains and the percentage of scored questions in each domain for the MLA-C01 exam (in use until September 28, 2026) and the MLA-C02 exam (in use beginning September 29, 2026).
| MLA-C01 Domain | MLA-C02 Content Domain |
|---|---|
| Domain 1: Data Preparation for Machine Learning (ML) (28%) | Content Domain 1: Data Preparation for ML and AI (28% of scored content) |
| Domain 2: ML Model Development (26%) | Content Domain 2: ML Model and Foundation Model (FM) Development (24% of scored content) |
| Domain 3: Deployment and Orchestration of ML Workflows (22%) | Content Domain 3: Deployment and Orchestration of ML and AI Workflows (24% of scored content) |
| Domain 4: ML Solution Monitoring, Maintenance, and Security (24%) | Content Domain 4: Operating, Monitoring, and Securing ML and AI Solutions (24% of scored content) |
Additions of content for MLA-C02
In Task 1.1, the following content was added:
1.1.7 Configure scalable vector databases for AI applications (for example, OpenSearch Service, Amazon RDS with pgvector, Amazon S3) based on specifications.
1.1.8 Ingest and store diverse data types (for example, text, images, audio) for AI and ML applications.
In Task 1.2, the following content was added:
1.2.5 Configure and use embedding models to transform text and image data into numerical representations.
1.2.6 Apply advanced text pre-processing techniques (for example, tokenization, domain-specific augmentation).
1.2.7 Prepare documents for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) applications (for example, chunking strategies, metadata extraction).
1.2.8 Mask, redact, and anonymize data.
1.2.9 Prepare data for FM fine-tuning, continuous pre-training, and model distillation.
In Task 1.3, the following content was added:
1.3.4 Optimize multimodal data distributions by applying bias metrics across numeric, text, and image assets.
1.3.6 Validate AI training data integrity (for example, prompt-response pair validation, content safety screening).
1.3.7 Clean data (for example, by detecting outliers, imputing missing data, deduplication).
In Task 2.1, the following content was added:
2.1.1 Evaluate and select appropriate FMs from Amazon Bedrock based on task requirements and performance criteria.
2.1.2 Identify fine-tuning strategies for pre-trained FMs to meet business needs.
2.1.4 Evaluate tradeoffs between custom solutions, managed services, pre-trained models, and FMs to meet business needs.
2.1.5 Select Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture patterns based on use case requirements.
2.1.7 Assess tradeoffs between AI model performance, latency, and cost.
In Task 2.2, the following content was added:
2.2.8 Apply customization techniques for AI solutions (for example, task-specific prompt engineering, fine-tuning).
2.2.9 Optimize retrieval components and embedding models.
In Task 2.3, the following content was added:
2.3.7 Implement integrated human evaluation frameworks (for example, human-in-the-loop workflows, text generation quality assessment).
2.3.8 Apply natural language processing (NLP) evaluation metrics (for example, bilingual evaluation understudy [BLEU], Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation [ROUGE], BERTScore, semantic similarity).
2.3.9 Perform AI evaluation (for example, model output assessment, content quality validation, bias detection, LLM-as-a-judge frameworks).
2.3.10 Configure RAG system monitoring, including retrieval accuracy assessment.
In Task 3.1, the following content was added:
3.1.4 Evaluate and select appropriate foundation model (FM) deployment options.
3.1.5 Deploy models that were built outside of AWS into AWS environments (for example, Amazon SageMaker AI, Amazon Bedrock Custom Model Import).
3.1.6 Deploy and configure agents for specific tasks, integration with other services and tools, and agent communication protocols.
3.1.7 Configure FM deployment, model hosting, and resource allocation.
3.1.8 Apply Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) system configurations (for example, retrieval strategies, reranking).
In Task 3.2, the following content was added:
3.2.7 Create and manage Amazon Bedrock knowledge bases with vector database configurations, document indexing, and retrieval optimization.
3.2.8 Implement retrieval pipelines to meet business needs.
3.2.9 Implement agent state management systems.
3.2.10 Implement AI-specific resource scaling for GPU workloads.
3.2.11 Deploy agentic workflow infrastructure.
In Task 3.3, the following content was added:
3.3.7 Manage prompts (for example, Amazon Bedrock Prompt Management).
3.3.8 Implement automated agent deployment pipelines and agent version management.
3.3.9 Implement AI model testing frameworks, including prompt testing.
3.3.10 Configure FM deployment automation with fine-tuned model versioning.
3.3.11 Configure AI-specific pipeline orchestration for RAG system updates and knowledge base refresh cycles.
In Task 4.1, the following content was added:
4.1.5 Monitor and automate the management of agent performance and coordination (for example, coordination failure detection, truncated streaming, tool failures).
4.1.6 Configure AI-specific performance monitoring for foundation models (FMs), such as Amazon Bedrock evaluations.
In Task 4.2, the following content was added:
4.2.7 Evaluate cost implications of using FMs for inference in production.
4.2.8 Monitor agent resource consumption patterns.
4.2.9 Manage FM inference costs with usage optimization.
4.2.10 Monitor AI-specific cost patterns (for example, token usage optimization, embedding computation costs, vector database storage optimization).
In Task 4.3, the following content was added:
4.3.1 Secure continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines by checking for code and image vulnerabilities (for example, by using Amazon CodeGuru, Amazon Inspector).
4.3.8 Select the appropriate credential type to access FMs (for example, Amazon Bedrock API keys, IAM credentials).
4.3.9 Implement safeguards and sensitive data protection to meet application requirements and responsible AI policies (for example, by using Amazon Bedrock Guardrails).
Deletions of content for MLA-C02
In Task 1.3, the following content was removed:
Configuring data to load into the model training resource (for example, Amazon EFS, Amazon FSx)
In Task 2.2, the following content was removed:
Using custom datasets to fine-tune pre-trained models (for example, Amazon Bedrock, SageMaker JumpStart)
Reducing model size (for example, by altering data types, pruning, updating feature selection, compression)
In Task 3.1, the following content was removed:
Methods to optimize models on edge devices (for example, SageMaker Neo)
In Task 3.2, the following content was removed:
Bring your own container (BYOC) with SageMaker
In Task 4.2, the following content was removed:
Monitoring infrastructure (for example, by using Amazon EventBridge events)
Troubleshooting capacity concerns that involve cost and performance (for example, provisioned concurrency, service quotas, auto scaling)
Recategorizations of content for MLA-C02
The following content reorganizations have occurred in the transition from MLA-C01 to MLA-C02:
The following task statements have been recategorized:
MLA-C01 Task Statement 1.1 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
1.1 Collect and store data.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 1.2 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
1.2 Perform data transformation, feature engineering, and pre-processing.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 1.3 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
1.3 Validate data quality and manage bias.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 2.1 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
2.1 Choose appropriate modeling approaches for ML and AI solutions.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 2.2 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
2.2 Train, fine-tune, and customize models for ML and AI solutions.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 2.3 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
2.3 Analyze and evaluate the performance of ML and AI systems.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 3.1 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
3.1 Manage deployment infrastructure for ML and AI model types.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 3.2 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
3.2 Provision and configure resources for ML and AI workloads based on existing architecture and requirements.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 3.3 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
3.3 Implement automated orchestration and continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines for MLOps and AI workloads.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 4.1 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
4.1 Monitor ML and AI model inference and performance.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 4.2 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
4.2 Optimize and manage ML and AI infrastructure costs and performance.
MLA-C01 Task Statement 4.3 is mapped to the following task in MLA-C02:
4.3 Secure ML and AI workloads and model endpoints.