Monitoring AWS Network Security Manager
Monitoring AWS Network Security Manager helps you understand whether your resources are protected as intended. AWS Network Security Manager provides the following monitoring capabilities:
-
Synchronization status APIs -- Query the protection state of individual resources across your deployments.
-
AWS CloudTrail -- Record all AWS Network Security Manager API calls for auditing, compliance, and operational troubleshooting.
Monitoring synchronization status
The primary way to monitor whether your resources are protected is through the synchronization status APIs. AWS Network Security Manager evaluates each in-scope resource and records whether its actual firewall configuration matches the intended configuration.
Synchronization status operations
AWS Network Security Manager provides two operations for querying synchronization status:
- ListResourceSynchronizationStatuses
-
Returns per-resource status for a specific deployment. Requires a
deploymentIdentifierparameter. Optionally filter bysynchronizationStatus(IN_SYNC, OUT_OF_SYNC, or NOT_APPLICABLE). - ListAggregateResourceSynchronizationStatuses
-
Returns per-resource aggregate status across all of your deployments. Optionally filter by
synchronizationStatus. This operation shows the combined result of all policies that apply to each resource.
Both operations support pagination with maxResults (1 to 100) and
nextToken.
Understanding synchronization status values
- IN_SYNC
-
The resource's actual firewall configuration matches the effective configuration computed from all applicable policies.
- OUT_OF_SYNC
-
The resource's actual configuration differs from the effective configuration. The
outOfSyncReasonsfield provides per-setting details showing expected versus actual values. - NOT_APPLICABLE
-
The resource's account and resource type are in scope, but the resource itself does not match the scope filters (for example, a tag filter excludes it). No action is needed.
If a resource does not appear in the results at all, the account or resource type is not in scope for the deployment. Check your scope configuration.
Understanding evaluation timestamps
Each synchronization status entry includes two timestamps:
-
evaluatedAt-- When AWS Network Security Manager last evaluated the resource's configuration. A staleevaluatedAtvalue indicates that evaluation has not yet run for recent changes. -
updatedAt-- When the synchronization status record itself last changed. IfupdatedAtis older thanevaluatedAt, the status has been stable since the last evaluation.
Cross-account visibility
When multiple administrators protect the same resource, visibility into the
aggregate synchronization status depends on the
enableCrossAccountVisibility setting on each deployment.
-
If all deployments covering a resource have cross-account visibility enabled, any administrator can see the full aggregate status and out-of-sync reasons.
-
If any deployment has cross-account visibility disabled, other administrators see a
NOT_VISIBLEmarker instead of detailed reasons. This indicates that another administrator also protects the resource but has not shared visibility.
Diagnosing out-of-sync resources
When a resource reports OUT_OF_SYNC, the outOfSyncReasons field
identifies the specific configuration differences. The top-level reason is one
of:
-
missingFirewall-- No firewall protection is associated with the resource. -
invalidFirewall-- A firewall exists but its configuration does not match expectations. Specific differences are listed in categorized buckets.
If remediation is enabled but cannot fix the resource, the
remediationIssues field provides a correctiveAction with
guidance on how to resolve the issue manually. Remediation is a policy-level setting that
is turned off by default. For more information, see
Synchronization and remediation.
Multiple deployments with different configurations can target the same resource. In this case, the per-deployment synchronization status can be OUT_OF_SYNC while the aggregate synchronization status is IN_SYNC. This is expected behavior, not a failure. A higher-priority policy's settings took precedence during merging. As a result, the resource matches the effective configuration, even though it does not match the configuration of the lower-priority deployment.